Gibson v. St. Anthony Hotel.

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas
Gibson v. St. Anthony Hotel., 198 S.W. 412 (1917)
1917 Tex. App. LEXIS 935
Moursund

Gibson v. St. Anthony Hotel.

Opinion of the Court

MOURSUND, J.

Homer Gibson obtained a judgment against the St. Anthony Hotel in justice’s court for $20.85, and an appeal was taken to the county court. The suit was for wages alleged to be due plaintiff for services rendered.

[1,2] In the county court plaintiff by amendment sought to recover exemplary damages, alleging that defendant’s failure to pay the debt due plaintiff was willful and .malicious, and that therefore he was entitled to recover damages in a sum equal to 'five months’ wages at the agreed price, which sum is $97.50. No facts were alleged showing that the manner in which the breach of contract was committed amounted to a tort. It is clear that the petition stated no cause of action for exemplary damages. Hooks v. Fitzenrieter, 76 Tex. 277, 13 S. W. 230; Peterson v. Thomas, 24 S. W. 1124; S. W. Tel. Co. v. Luckett, 60 Tex. Civ. App. 117,127 S. W. 856. This being true, the amount in controversy was less than $100, and the jurisdiction of the county court final. The writ of error must therefore be dismissed. Wells Fargo & Co. v. Burford, 59 Tex. Civ. App. 645, 126 S. W. 927; Connor V. Sewell, 90 Tex. 275, 38 S. W. 35; W. U. Tel. Co. v. Arnold, 97 Tex. 365, 77 S. W. 249, 79 S. W. 8.

Writ of error dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

ifes>For other cases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes

Reference

Cited By
1 case
Status
Published