McKay v. Fulgham
McKay v. Fulgham
220 S.W. 171
(South Western Reporter)
McKay v. Fulgham
Opinion of the Court
This is a companion case with 1615, McKay v. Tally, 220 S. W. 167, this day handed down. The allegations for cancellation of the oil lease are substantially the same as in that case. The terms of the lease are the same here as there, and the facts established on the trial are identical, except that $96 was paid before the time limit expired to the Wor-sham Banking Company.
This ease will be ruled by the Tally Case, and upon the authority of that ease we reverse and render this one.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.