Ballew & Huston v. Blakeny
Opinion of the Court
(after stating the facts as above).
The third assignment assails the sufficiency of the evidence to show such nonperformance of the contract of sale as to entitle the plaintiff to recover the money sued for. We conclude that this assignment should be overruled.
There' is no reversible error in the fourth assignment of error, and it is overruled.
The judgment is modified and affirmed.
dfcaFor other oases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes
Addendum
On Rehearing.
The motion for rehearing is granted only in so far as it seeks to modify the judgment of the county court. The judgment authorizes a recovery and ' execution against each of the defendants severally and jointly for the $600 sued for. The judgment should be corrected, s* as to provide that the payment to the plaintiff by the bank of the $600 should be in full satisfaction of the entire judgment.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.