Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Statutes
Free Legal Archive /Texas /Cases /Texas Courts of Appeals /

1921

944 Court of Civil Appeals of Texas opinions from 1921.

  • Schaff v. Ulmer 236 S.W. 145, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • Applewhite v. Silvey 236 S.W. 1118, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • Stephenson v. Stitz 235 S.W. 271, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Thompson 235 S.W. 913, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • Panhandle & S. F. Ry. Co. v. Mayhugh 235 S.W. 915, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • Sanders v. Hickman 235 S.W. 278, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • Coughran v. Briam 235 S.W. 627, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • Payne v. Bassett 235 S.W. 917, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • Cleveland v. Spencer 235 S.W. 632, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • Spark v. Lasater 234 S.W. 1108, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • Schmidt v. Willmann 235 S.W. 629, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • Ferguson-Mckinney Dry Goods Co. v. Garrett 235 S.W. 245, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • Lancaster v. Sale 235 S.W. 648, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • Davis v. Hudson 235 S.W. 1109, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • Blevins v. Houston Electric Co. 235 S.W. 987, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • Queen City Motor Co. v. Texas Auto Supply Co. 241 S.W. 212, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • Community of Priests of St. Basil v. Byrne 236 S.W. 1016, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • Dickson v. Barr 235 S.W. 977, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • Creosoted Wood Block Paving Co. v. McKay 234 S.W. 587, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • Weems v. First Nat. Bank of Winnsboro 234 S.W. 931, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • Republic Supply Co. v. Weaver 235 S.W. 684, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • Texas & N. O. R. v. Middlebrook 234 S.W. 932, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • Schaff v. Saunders 236 S.W. 1119, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • Wagner v. J. B. Colt Co. 234 S.W. 934, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • Lancaster v. Eidson 234 S.W. 708, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • Lancaster v. Rogers & Adams 235 S.W. 643, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • Allen v. City Realty Co. 236 S.W. 231, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • Kimball-Mathews Co. v. Nagel 235 S.W. 318, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • E. F. Elmberg Co. v. Dunlap Hardware Co. 234 S.W. 700, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • Smith v. Dawson 234 S.W. 690, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • Black v. Lambert 235 S.W. 704, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • Martin v. Foy 234 S.W. 698, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • Norwich State Bank v. Kanner 235 S.W. 248, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • San Antonio Loan & Trust Co. v. Davis 235 S.W. 612, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • Fontana v. Port Arthur Traction Co. 235 S.W. 1098, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • Gibson v. Davis 236 S.W. 202, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • Cecacci v. Martelli 235 S.W. 951, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • Baker v. Beatty 235 S.W. 971, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • United Producers' Pipe Line Co. v. Lantry-Fike Const. Co. 238 S.W. 331, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • Republic Ins. Co. v. Moss 235 S.W. 700, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • Pavey v. McFarland 234 S.W. 591, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • Gulf Production Co. v. Gibson 234 S.W. 906, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • Otis v. Hatfield 235 S.W. 978, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • Moerschell v. City of Eagle Lake 236 S.W. 996, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • Western Union Telegraph Co. v. King 235 S.W. 286, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • Southern Surety Co. v. Beaird 235 S.W. 240, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • Stark v. Slack 234 S.W. 687, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • Turner v. First Nat. Bank of Sulphur Springs 234 S.W. 928, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • Samworth v. Hudson 234 S.W. 423, (Tex. App. 1921)
  • Midkiff v. Benson 235 S.W. 292, (Tex. App. 1921)
« Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 … 23 Next »

A public interest project of Aaron Hall, Attorney at Law © 2026

About Federal Minnesota California New York Texas Terms

Data from CourtListener / Free Law Project

↑