Appellee sued appellant for $525.00. Appellant admitted an indebtedness of $50.00. The jury’s verdict, if followed, required a judgment in appellee’s favor fo,r $259.50. The Court required a remittitur of $97.00, *162 and entered judgment finally for $162.50, from which judgment this appeal is prosecuted. A careful consideration of the record and of the briefs of the parties fails to convince .us that the Court committed re--versible error, or that the judgment is without support in the evidence. Further comment in cases of-this character is not required by .the statute, .nor,do the questions involved justify prolonged discussion. Associated Indemnity Corporation v. Gatling, Tex.Civ.App., 75 S.W.2d 294; Tucker v. Higdon, Tex.Civ.App., 115 S.W.2d 973; Texas & N. O. R. R. Co. v. Stumberg, Tex.Civ.App., 115 S.W.2d 1126.

Judgment is affirmed. .