Holcomb v. Copeland
Holcomb v. Copeland
118 S.W.2d 932; 1938 Tex. App. LEXIS 54
(South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Holcomb v. Copeland
Opinion of the Court
Plaintiffs in error having filed no briefs upon this writ of error, the same is dis *933 missed for want of prosecution. Haynes v. J. M. Radford Grocery Co., 118 Tex. 277, 14 S.W.2d 811.
Dismissed.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.