OPINION ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

The State, in its Motion for Rehearing of 705 S.W.2d 398, urges us to hold the Speedy Trial Act, TEX.CODE CRIM.PROC. ANN. art. 32A.02 (Vernon Supp. 1986), unconstitutional for the reason that the caption of said Act does not comply with the requirements of TEX. CONST, art. Ill, sec. 35.

This Court addressed this contention in the case of Wright v. State, 696 S.W.2d 288 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1985, no pet.), and the majority held that the Act was constitutional, therefore, the State’s Motion for Rehearing is overruled.

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

concurring.

The State seeks rehearing on the ground that this Court has applied an unconstitutional statute — The Speedy Trial Act, referring to our decision in Wright v. State, 696 S.W.2d 288 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1985, no pet.) and the dissent thereto. While I remain firm in my dissent in that cause, I feel forced to agree that I am currently bound by the decision. I reluctantly concur *352in the overruling of the motion for rehearing in this cause.