APPELLANT

APPELLEE

PER CURIAM

In each cause, the district court found appellant guilty of robbery after hearing his pleas of guilty. Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 29.02 (1989). Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, punishment was assessed at imprisonment for twenty years.

Appellant's court-appointed attorney filed briefs in which he concludes that the appeals are frivolous and without merit. The briefs meet the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). A copy of counsel's briefs were delivered to appellant, and appellant was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel's briefs and agree that the appeals are frivolous and without merit. Further, we find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeals.

The judgments of conviction are affirmed.

[Before Chief Justice Carroll, Justices Aboussie and Kidd]

Affirmed

Filed:  October 9, 1991

[Do Not Publish]