APPELLANT

APPELLEE

PER CURIAM

In no. 3-90-208-CR, appellant was found guilty following his plea of guilty to the offense of aggravated robbery. In no. 3-90-209-CR, appellant was found guilty following his pleas of guilty to aggravated assault (count one) and possession of cocaine (count two). Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, punishment was assessed in both causes at imprisonment for thirty-three years.

Appellant's court-appointed attorney has filed a brief in which he has concluded that the appeals are frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, ___ U.S. ___, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Cr. App. 1969); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Cr. App. 1972); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Cr. App. 1974); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Cr. App. 1978). A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.

We have carefully reviewed the record and counsel's brief and agree that the appeals are frivolous and without merit. Further, we find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeals.

The judgments of conviction are affirmed.

[Before Justices Powers, Aboussie and Kidd]

Affirmed

Filed: May 8, 1991

[Do Not Publish]