APPELLANTS

APPELLEES

PER CURIAM

This is a dismissal for want of prosecution.

Generally, an appellant must file his brief within thirty days after the filing of the transcript and statement of facts, if any. Tex. R. App. P. Ann. 74(k) (Pamph. 1992). If the appellant fails to file his brief within the prescribed time, the appellate court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, unless the appellant shows a reasonable explanation for failing to file the brief and the appellee has not suffered material injury. Tex. R. App. P. Ann. 74(l)(1) (Pamph. 1992).

The statement of facts in this cause was filed on February 26, 1992; the transcript was filed on April 21, 1992. Accordingly, appellants' brief was due thirty days later, on May 21, 1992. Appellants have not filed their brief. Moreover, appellants have not filed a motion for extension of time showing a reasonable explanation for their omission. See Tex. R. App. P. Ann. 74(n) (Pamph. 1992). Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See Dickson v. Dickson, 541 S.W.2d 895 (Tex. Civ. App. 1976, writ dism'd w.o.j.).

[Before Chief Justice Carroll, Justices Aboussie and B. A. Smith;

Justice Smith not participating]

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: July 1, 1992

[Do Not Publish]