Michael Lynn Batson v. State
Michael Lynn Batson v. State
Opinion
APPELLANT
APPELLEE
PER CURIAM
This is an appeal from a conviction for speeding. Punishment was assessed at a $75 fine.
Appellant has filed a motion to withdraw the appeal. No decision of this Court has been delivered. The motion is granted and the appeal is dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. Ann. 59(b) (Pamph. 1992).
[Before Chief Justice Carroll, Justices Aboussie and B. A. Smith]
Dismissed On Appellant's Motion
Filed: April 15, 1992
[Do Not Publish]
Mr. Kyle W. Maysel
130 E. San Antonio, Suite C
San Marcos, Texas 78666
Honorable Lucy Del Prado Dietz
Assistant Criminal District Attorney
Hays County Courthouse, Room 208
San Marcos, Texas 78666
Re: No. 3-92-068-CR--Michael Lynn Batson v. The State of Texas (t/c no. 35,445)
Counsel:
In accordance with Rule 91, Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, enclosed is a copy of the opinion and judgment handed down by this Court on this date in the above cause.
The Court's mandate has been issued this date to the clerk of the trial court under separate cover.
Very truly yours,
W. KENNETH LAW, CLERK
By
Barbara E. Chapman, Deputy
Enclosures
xc: State Prosecuting Attorney
Clerk, Court of Criminal Appeals
Honorable Linda A. Rodriguez, County Judge
Mr. Ronnie Dannelley, County Clerk
MR. KYLE W. MAYSEL
130 E. SAN ANTONIO, SUITE C
SAN MARCOS TX 78666
HONORABLE LUCY DEL PRADO DIETZ
ASSISTANT CRIMINAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY
HAYS COUNTY COURTHOUSE, ROOM 208
SAN MARCOS TX 78666
MR. W. H. MOORE
DISTRICT CLERK
HAYS COUNTY COURTHOUSE
SAN MARCOS TX 78666
THE STATE OF TEXAS.
TO THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 DISTRICT COURT of HAYS COUNTY - GREETINGS:
Before our COURT OF APPEALS, on the 15th of April A.D. 1992, the cause upon appeal to revise or reverse your Judgment between
MICHAEL LYNN BATSON, Appellant,
No. 3-92-068-CR vs.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee,
was determined; and therein our said COURT OF APPEALS made its orders in these words:
THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the written motion of the appellant to dismiss the appeal and the same being considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that the same should be granted: it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by the Court that appellant be allowed to withdraw notice of appeal and that the appeal be dismissed; that the appellant pay all costs in this behalf expended; and that this decision be certified below for observance.
WHEREFORE, We command you to observe the order of said COURT OF APPEALS in this behalf and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed and executed.
WITNESS the HONORABLE JIMMY CARROLL, Chief Justice of our said COURT OF APPEALS for the Third District of Texas, with the seal thereof annexed, at the City of Austin, this the 15th day of April A.D. 1992.
W. KENNETH LAW, CLERK
by: , Deputy
Barbara E. Chapman
Mr. Ronnie Dannelley
County Clerk
Hays County Courthouse
San Marcos, Texas 78666
Re: No. 3-92-068-CR--Michael Lynn Batson v. State of Texas
(t/c no. 35,445)
Dear Mr. Dannelley:
Enclosed, with reference to the above cause, is the mandate of this Court. Please acknowledge your receipt of same by returning the enclosed card (No. 1) to this office, appropriately completed.
Rule 87(b), Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, sets out the procedures to be followed upon your receipt of the mandate.
Upon execution of the mandate in accordance with the rule, either your office or the sheriff's office should return the remaining card enclosed (No. 2), appropriately completed.
Your cooperation in this regard is appreciated.
Very truly yours,
W. KENNETH LAW, CLERK
by
Barbara E. Chapman, Deputy
Enclosures to Clerk
xc: Mr. Kyle W. Maysel
Honorable Lucy Del Prado Dietz, Assistant Criminal District Attorney
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.