Sterling Allen, A/K/A Sterling Clarence Allen, Jr. v. State
Sterling Allen, A/K/A Sterling Clarence Allen, Jr. v. State
Opinion
APPELLANT
APPELLEE
PER CURIAM
A jury found appellant guilty of theft of property having a value greater than $750 but less than $20,000. Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 31.03 (1989 & Supp. 1992). The jury assessed punishment, enhanced by two previous felony conviction, at imprisonment for fifteen years and a $2000 fine. After being admonished by the court of the disadvantages of self-representation, appellant waived counsel on appeal.
The statement of facts was filed on November 20, 1991. On January 27, 1992, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that his brief was overdue. Appellant did not respond to this notice, and no brief has been tendered for filing. Because appellant represents himself, he bears full responsibility for the failure to file a brief. We will therefore consider this appeal without briefs.
We have examined the transcript and statement of facts. We find no fundamental error or other matter that should be considered in the interest of justice.
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
[Before Justices Powers, Jones and Kidd]
Affirmed
Filed: February 26, 1992
[Do Not Publish]
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.