APPELLANT

APPELLEE

PER CURIAM

A jury found appellant guilty of theft of property having a value greater than $750 but less than $20,000. Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 31.03 (1989 & Supp. 1992). The jury assessed punishment, enhanced by a previous felony conviction, at imprisonment for twenty years. After being admonished by the court of the disadvantages of self-representation, appellant waived counsel on appeal.

The statement of facts was filed on October 1, 1991. On November 19, 1991, the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that his brief was overdue. Appellant did not respond to this notice, and no brief has been tendered for filing. Because appellant represents himself, he bears full responsibility for the failure to file a brief. We will therefore consider this appeal without briefs.

We have examined the transcript and statement of facts. We find no fundamental error or other matter that should be considered in the interest of justice.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

[Before Chief Justice Carroll, Justices Aboussie and B. A. Smith]

Affirmed

Filed: February 12, 1992

[Do Not Publish]