APPELLANTS

FRANKLIN FEDERAL BANCORP,

APPELLEE

This cause was removed to the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas on October 28, 1988. Henderson v. Federal Sav. & Loan Ins. Corp., No. A-88-CA-946. The federal court remanded the cause to this Court on December 14, 1990. This Court subsequently directed the district court of Travis County to conduct a hearing and determine what individual owns the asset or liability at issue. The district court on September 27, 1993, determined that appellee Franklin Federal Bancorp, the only party remaining in the lawsuit adverse to appellants Roy J. Henderson and Regina J. Henderson, does not own the asset or liability.

The Hendersons have not contested the state district court's determination that Franklin Federal does not own the asset or liability. Rather, the Hendersons have tendered a motion to remand the cause to the state district court so that court can (1) determine who owns the asset or liability at issue and (2) name the owner as the defendant in this lawsuit.

This Court has no authority to remand the cause and allow the addition of new parties and the continuation of this lawsuit against those parties. There have already been two final judgments in this cause--the judgment signed July 8, 1988, by the state district court and the judgment entered December 14, 1990, by the clerk of the federal district court. These two judgments have reduced the parties adverse to the Hendersons to Franklin Federal, and the state district court has determined that Franklin Federal does not own the asset or liability. If the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation owns the asset or liability, then the Hendersons have no recourse in this Court because the federal district court dismissed the FDIC. If the FDIC transferred the asset or liability to someone other than Franklin Federal, then the Hendersons failed to bring that party into the federal-court suit before remand. The Hendersons' motion to remand is overruled.

As an appellate court, we are constrained to review the judgment of the state trial court as modified in this cause by the federal district court. This appeal no longer contains a dispute between the parties to the appeal, and, therefore, the appeal is moot.

The appeal is dismissed as moot.

Before Chief Justice Carroll, Justices Aboussie and B. A. Smith

Appeal Dismissed as Moot

Filed: November 10, 1993

Do Not Publish