Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 1993

Lionel Oliver Lanau v. State

Lionel Oliver Lanau v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided September 15, 1993

Lionel Oliver Lanau v. State

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS,


AT AUSTIN










NO. 3-93-043-CR






LIONEL OLIVER LANAU,


APPELLANT



vs.






THE STATE OF TEXAS,


APPELLEE







FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF FAYETTE COUNTY, 155TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT


NO. 92R-051, HONORABLE DAN R. BECK, JUDGE PRESIDING








PER CURIAM

After accepting appellant's plea of guilty, the district court found that the evidence substantiated appellant's guilt of the offense of possession of less than twenty-eight grams of lysergic acid diethylamide, a controlled substance. Tex. Health & Safety Code Ann. § 481.115 (West 1992). The court deferred further proceedings without adjudicating guilt and placed appellant on probation for five years. See Dillehey v. State, 815 S.W.2d 623 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991).

Appellant was represented by retained counsel at trial. The same attorney represented appellant on appeal until his motion to withdraw as counsel was granted by this Court. Tex. R. App. P. 7. There is no indication of indigence in the record and appellant does not appear to have retained substitute counsel. Appellant has not filed a brief and has failed to respond to this Court's notice that the brief is overdue. Tex. R. App. P. 74(l). Under the circumstances, this Court will consider the appeal without briefs.

We have examined the record and find no error that should be considered in the interest of justice.

The order deferring adjudication is affirmed.



Before Chief Justice Carroll, Justices Aboussie and B. A. Smith

Affirmed

Filed: September 15, 1993

Do Not Publish

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.