Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Court of Appeals of Texas, 1994

Gray v. Shipley

Gray v. Shipley
Court of Appeals of Texas · Decided April 21, 1994 · Oliver-Parrott, Hutson-Dunn, Mirabal
877 S.W.2d 806; 1994 Tex. App. LEXIS 910; 1994 WL 170245 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)
Gray v. Shipley

Cases that cite this one

147 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Relator, Larry L. Gray, has filed a pro se motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus. He is charged by indictment with possession of a controlled substance.

Relator seeks the writ of mandamus so that “the validity of a warrantless arrest with no probable cause justifying arrest be ruled upon to determine if further prosecution of relator may be continued.” Relator is represented by appointed counsel in the trial court. Relator is not entitled to hybrid representation. Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623, 625 (Tex.Crim.App. 1981).

Accordingly, we overrule relator’s motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.