Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 1994

Martin DeMasters v. State

Martin DeMasters v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided April 6, 1994

Martin DeMasters v. State

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT OF TEXAS,


AT AUSTIN










NO. 3-93-447-CR

NO. 3-93-448-CR

AND

NO. 3-93-449-CR






MARTIN DeMASTERS,


APPELLANT



vs.






THE STATE OF TEXAS,


APPELLEE







FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF HAYS COUNTY


NOS. 38,354, 37,918, & 38,355,


HONORABLE LINDA A. RODRIGUEZ, JUDGE PRESIDING







PER CURIAM





These are appeals from judgments of conviction for assault in which neither a statement of facts from the trial nor a brief has been filed. At a hearing conducted pursuant to Rules 53(m) and 74(l) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, appellant was asked by counsel, "[Y]ou are voluntarily waiving this appeal at this point, is that correct?" Appellant answered, "Yes." Appellant has not withdrawn his notices of appeal in writing. Tex. R. App. P. 59(b). Under the circumstances, we will consider the appeals on the present records and without briefs. Tex. R. App. P. 53(m), 74(l).

We have examined the transcripts and find no fundamental error or other matter that should be considered in the interest of justice. The judgments of conviction are affirmed.



Before Justices Powers, Aboussie and Jones

Affirmed on All Causes

Filed: April 6, 1994

Do Not Publish

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.