APPELLANT

APPELLEE

PER CURIAM

A jury found appellant guilty of indecency with a child and aggravated sexual assault. Tex. Penal Code Ann. §§ 21.11, 22.021 (West 1989). The jury assessed punishment, enhanced by a previous felony conviction, at imprisonment for twenty-five years for the indecency with a child, and at imprisonment for forty-five years and a $2500 fine for the aggravated sexual assault.

In two points of error, appellant urges that the statutory instruction on the law of parole and good time credit given in this cause violates the due process clause of the United States Constitution and the due course of law clause of the Texas Constitution. Act of May 3, 1989, 71st Leg., R.S., ch. 103, § 1, 1989 Tex. Gen. Laws 442 (Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 37.07, § 4, since amended); U.S. Const. amend. XIV; Tex. Const. art. I, § 19. These arguments have been made to and rejected by the Court of Criminal Appeals. Muhammad v. State, 830 S.W.2d 953 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992); Oakley v. State, 830 S.W.2d 107 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992). The points of error are overruled.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Before Justices Powers, Jones and Kidd

Affirmed

Filed: January 12, 1994

Do Not Publish