LANNIE v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline
LANNIE v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline
Opinion
OPINION
Appellant has filed no brief. On June 13, 1995, this Court notified appellant by letter that this appeal would be dismissed if no party filed a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. TEX. R. APP. P. 60(a)(2). Appellant has filed no response to this letter and has not filed a motion for extension to file the brief.
This Court may dismiss an appeal for want of prosecution when the appellant files no brief. TEX. R. APP. P. 74 (0(1); *413 Lewis v. City of Port Arthur, 727 S.W.2d 36 (Tex.App.-Beaumont 1987, no writ)(appeal dismissed where appellant did not file statement of facts, brief or motions to extend time). Appellant has done nothing but file the transcript.
Accordingly we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.