Court of Appeals of Texas, 1995

Garner v. Gately

Court of Appeals of Texas · Decided June 28, 1995 · Thomas, Cummings, Vance

909 S.W.2d 61; 1995 Tex. App. LEXIS 1426; 1995 WL 422547 (South Western Reporter, Second Series)

Cases that cite this one

19 later published cases cite this decision.

In re Johnathan Arthurton v. the State of Texas (Tex. App. 2025)
In re Andrew Pete v. the State of Texas (Tex. App. 2024)
in Re Davin Paul Cole (Tex. App. 2021)
in Re Devin Paul Cole (Tex. App. 2021)
in Re Sandra E. Brown (Tex. App. 2017)
in Re: Joe Trampas Benavides (Tex. App. 2015)
in Re Joseph Gus Mays (Tex. App. 2014)
in Re Robert Brown III (Tex. App. 2014)
in Re Phouthasack Phetvongkham (Tex. App. 2014)
in Re Joseph Larry Porter (Tex. App. 2011)
in Re James Calberg v. State (Tex. App. 2010)
Orville Hurley, Dee Hurley, Sondra D. Hurley, and Justin Cole Hurley v. Wood County Electric Cooperative, Inc. (Tex. App. 2009)
in Re: Sammy Earl Woods (Tex. App. 2006)
in Re Gregorio Matillas Soto, Jr., Relator (Tex. App. 2004)
in Re Gregorio Matillas Soto, Jr., Relator (Tex. App. 2004)
in Re Gregorio Matillas Soto, Jr., Relator (Tex. App. 2004)
in Re Dale Allen Hamer (Tex. App. 2002)
in Re Eduardo Trevino (Tex. App. 2001)
In re Turner (Tex. App. 1999)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

*62 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Richard Lee Gamer asks us for leave to file a petition for a •writ of mandamus compelling Sandy Gately, the district attorney of Coryell County, to produce the full names, birth dates, and “racial makeup” of the grand jury. Garner asserts that he made a request under the Open Records Act and that Gately has refused to provide the information. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §§ 552.001-552.353 (Vernon 1994).

Garner asserts that this court has jurisdiction to issue a writ by virtue of section 22.221(b) of the Government Code. See id. § 22.221(b) (Vernon 1988). A court of appeals may issue “all writs of mandamus, agreeable to the principles of law regulating those writs, against a judge of a district or county court in the court of appeals district.” Id. Gately is not a trial judge within our district; thus, under section 22.221(b), we do not have jurisdiction to issue a writ directed at her. See id.

The Open Records Act provides for mandamus in certain circumstances. Id. § 552.321. However, this provision does not grant original jurisdiction to the courts of appeals to issue such writs. Id.; Johnson v. Lynaugh 789 S.W.2d 704, 705-06 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st. Dist.] 1990, orig. proceeding).

We lack jurisdiction and thus deny leave to file the petition for writ of mandamus. See Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. § 22.221(b). We express no opinion on the merits of Garner’s request under the Open Records Act.

THOMAS, C.J., not participating.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.