PER CURIAM

By this appeal, G.A.M. attempts to challenge a discovery order. The clerk of this court informed G.A.M. by letter dated August 22, 1995, that the order from which he sought to appeal appeared to be an unappealable interlocutory order. The clerk informed G.A.M. that the case would be subject to dismissal unless, within fifteen days, he showed some basis on which this Court could exercise jurisdiction. G.A.M. responded by letter dated September 5, 1995 that he would seek a writ of mandamus to address his complaint.

G.A.M. since has filed separately a motion for leave to file petition for writ of mandamus with this Court; it was given cause number 03-95-00510-CV.

Because G.A.M. has not attempted to demonstrate this Court's jurisdiction over the instant cause, we find that he concedes that this Court has no jurisdiction over this attempt to directly appeal a discovery order. We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. See Tex. R. App. P. 60(b).

Before Justices Powers, Aboussie and Kidd

Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction

Filed: November 1, 1995

Do Not Publish