George Bastian v. State
George Bastian v. State
Opinion
PER CURIAM
Following his plea of no contest, appellant was found guilty of criminal trespass by the county court at law. Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 30.05 (West 1994). (1) The court assessed punishment at incarceration for five days.
Appellant represents himself on appeal. There is no statement of facts. Appellant's brief consists of a factual and procedural history of this prosecution, as seen from appellant's point of view. The brief does not contain points of error and otherwise fails to comply with the requirements of rule 74. Tex. R. App. P. 74. Under the circumstances, we are presented nothing for review. Montalvo v. State, 846 S.W.2d 133, 136-37 (Tex. App.--Austin 1993, no pet.); Elam v. State, 841 S.W.2d 937, 940 (Tex. App.--Austin 1992, no pet.).
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Before Chief Justice Carroll, Justices Aboussie and Jones
Affirmed
Filed: July 19, 1995
Do Not Publish
1. Amendments to section 30.05 subsequent to the offense are irrelevant to this cause.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.