PER CURIAM

The district court found appellant guilty of theft of services having a value of $750 or more but less than $20,000 and assessed punishment at imprisonment for five years. Act of May 30, 1977, 65th Leg., R.S., ch. 429, § 1, 1977 Tex. Gen. Laws 1138, amended by Act of May 24, 1983, 68th Leg., R.S., ch. 497, § 4, 1983 Tex. Gen. Laws 2917, 2920 (Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 31.04(a)(3), (e)(4), since amended). The court suspended imposition of sentence and placed appellant on community supervision.

Appellant was represented by retained counsel at trial and represents herself on appeal. The transcript contains no request for a free statement of facts or for the appointment of counsel on appeal. Neither a statement of facts nor a brief has been filed, and appellant has not responded to this Court's notices. Tex. R. App. P. 53(m), 74(l). We conclude that appellant does not wish to prosecute this appeal and has failed to make the necessary arrangements for filing a brief.

We have examined the transcript and find no error that should be considered in the interest of justice. The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

Before Chief Justice Carroll, Justice Aboussie and Jones

Affirmed

Filed: July 19, 1995

Do Not Publish