Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 1995

Stanley E. Newton v. William Fogelsanger

Stanley E. Newton v. William Fogelsanger
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided December 6, 1995

Stanley E. Newton v. William Fogelsanger

Opinion

Newton v. Fogelsanger






IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS


No. 10-95-296-CV


     STANLEY E. NEWTON, ET AL.,

                                                                                              Appellants

     v.


     WILLIAM FOGELSANGER,

                                                                                              Appellee

                                       


From the 18th District Court

Johnson County, Texas

Trial Court # 91-95

                                                                                                    


MEMORANDUM OPINION

                                                                                                    


      On November 29, 1995, Stanley and William Newton filed a motion to dismiss their appeal. In the relevant portion, Rule 59(a) provides:

(1) The appellate court may finally dispose of an appeal or writ of error as follows:

(A) In accordance with an agreement signed by all parties or their attorneys and filed with the clerk; or

(B) On motion of appellant to dismiss the appeal or affirm the judgment appealed from, with notice to all other parties; provided, that no other party shall be prevented from seeking any appellate relief it would otherwise be entitled to.

 

(2)If no transcript has been filed, the agreement or motion shall be accompanied by certified or sworn copies of the judgment appealed from and of the appeal bond or other document perfecting or attempting to perfect the appeal or writ of error.

Tex. R. App. P. 59(a).

      The Newtons have certified that they served the motion on William Fogelsanger, who seeks no affirmative relief in this court. The transcript for this appeal has not been filed; however, they have provided us with copies of the judgment and appeal bond, in compliance with the rule. Id.       Pursuant to their motion, the cause is dismissed.

                                                                               PER CURIAM


Before Chief Justice Thomas,

      Justice Cummings, and

      Justice Vance

Dismissed on appellant's motion

Opinion issued and filed December 6, 1995

Do not publish

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.