James Adam Morgan v. State
James Adam Morgan v. State
Opinion
PER CURIAM
A jury found appellant guilty of possession of an alcoholic beverage by a minor. Tex. Alco. Bev. Code Ann. § 106.05 (West 1995). The county court assessed punishment at a $500 fine.
Appellant's first point of error is that the court erred by overruling his motion to suppress evidence. The State concedes error and moves that the judgment of conviction be reversed. The motion is granted and the point of error is sustained. It is unnecessary to address the remaining points of error.
The judgment of conviction is reversed and the cause is remanded to the county court for a new trial.
Before Chief Justice Carroll, Justices Kidd and B. A. Smith
Reversed and Remanded
Filed: September 25, 1996
Do Not Publish
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.