Harry Johnson, Jr. v. State
Harry Johnson, Jr. v. State
Opinion
PER CURIAM
On August 25, 1995, following his conviction for murder, appellant was sentenced to imprisonment for sixty-five years. Trial counsel timely filed a motion for new trial, thus extending the time for perfecting appeal to November 23, 1995. Tex. R. App. P. 41(b)(1). Counsel did not file notice of appeal and was allowed to withdraw from the cause on January 23, 1996. On January 26, substitute counsel was appointed to represent appellant.
New counsel has filed a motion for out-of-time appeal in the interest of justice and judicial economy. Tex. R. App. P. 2(b). Rule 2(b), however, does not authorize us to suspend the appellate time limits. Garza v. State, 896 S.W.2d 192 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). Appellant's motion for out-of-time appeal is accordingly overruled. Without a timely filed notice of appeal, this Court is without jurisdiction. Rodarte v. State, 860 S.W.2d 108 (Tex. Crim. App. 1993); Shute v. State, 744 S.W.2d 96 (Tex. Crim. App. 1988).
The appeal is dismissed.
Before Chief Justice Carroll, Justices Aboussie and Kidd
Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction
Filed: February 14, 1996
Do Not Publish
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.