Warford Dingle v. State
Warford Dingle v. State
Opinion
Following a plea of no contest, the county court at law found appellant guilty of driving while intoxicated, second offense. Tex. Penal Code Ann. §§ 49.04(a), 49.09(a) (West Supp. 1997). The court assessed punishment at incarceration for 200 days.
Appellant represents himself on appeal. There is no statement of facts. In his brief, appellant contends he was misled by his attorney. He also complains of misconduct by the county court at law and its employees. None of these contentions is supported by the record before us.
The State's motion to dismiss the appeal is overruled. See Lemmons v. State, 818 S.W.2d 58 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Before Chief Justice Carroll, Justices Aboussie and B. A. Smith
Affirmed
Filed: April 24, 1997
Do Not Publish
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.