Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 1997

in Re Ana Lucia Gelabert

in Re Ana Lucia Gelabert
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided November 19, 1997

in Re Ana Lucia Gelabert

Opinion

In re Ana Lucia Gelabert






IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS


No. 10-97-281-CV


IN RE ANA LUCIA GELABERT



Original Proceeding

                                                                                                                

O P I N I O N

                                                                                                                


      Relator Ana Lucia Gelabert was convicted of two counts of attempted capital murder. The jury sentenced her to life on each count. The First District Court of Appeals affirmed her convictions in Gelabert v. State, 712 S.W.2d 813 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1986, pet. ref'd).

      Presently, Gelabert is seeking relief by way of habeas corpus because she feels she has been wrongfully denied some of her "good conduct" time by the prison officials. She mailed her application for a writ of habeas corpus to the District Clerk of Coryell County who has not filed the application.

      She brings this mandamus action against Judge Zeigler and his Court Administrator, whom Relator identifies as a "clerk," seeking a writ from this court ordering the clerk to file the application for a writ of habeas corpus and to set it for hearing. Her only complaint against Judge Zeigler seems to be that although he has been made aware of her application, he has not held a hearing on it.

      Mandamus is available only when relator has no adequate remedy at law. Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding). In this case, Gelabert does have another adequate legal remedy available. She could file a petition for mandamus relief with Judge Zeigler requesting that he direct the clerk to file her application and set it for hearing. See Crouch v. Stanley, 390 S.W.2d 795, 798 (Tex. Civ. App.—Eastland 1965, writ ref'd n.r.e.), which holds that "a District Court has jurisdiction to entertain a petition for a writ of mandamus . . . where . . . there has been a failure of a public official to perform a ministerial duty."

      For the reasons hereinabove stated, Relator's Petition for Writ of Mandamus is denied.

 

                                                                               JOHN A. JAMES, JR.

                                                                               Justice (Retired)


Before Chief Justice Davis,

      Justice Vance, and

      Justice James (Retired)

Petition denied

Opinion delivered and filed November 19, 1997

Do not publish

justify">Dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed January 17, 2001

Do not publish                                                                                 

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.