Warren Tod Morrison v. State
Warren Tod Morrison v. State
Opinion
In his only point of error, appellant contends the district court erred by failing to admonish him in accordance with Code of Criminal Procedure article 26.13 before accepting his plea of true at the revocation hearing. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 26.13(a) (West 1994). This contention is without merit because article 26.13 does not apply to probation revocation proceedings. Harris v. State, 505 S.W.2d 576, 578 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Lanum v. State, 952 S.W.2d 36, 39 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1997, no pet.). We note that appellant was properly admonished in writing at the time he pleaded guilty. See Art. 26.13(d). The point of error is overruled.
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
J. Woodfin Jones, Justice
Before Chief Justice Yeakel, Justices Aboussie and Jones
Affirmed
Filed: November 13, 1998
Do Not Publish
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.