James Mark Sadler v. State
James Mark Sadler v. State
Opinion
In his only point of error, appellant contends the court failed to admonish him properly before accepting his plea. Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 26.13(a) (West 1989). Appellant correctly points out that the court did not admonish him orally. The required admonishments, however, may be given either orally or in writing. Id. art. 26.13(d). The clerk's record contains a written admonishment form complying with article 26.13(d) and reflecting that appellant was fully admonished as required by article 26.13(a). The point of error is overruled.
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Lee Yeakel, Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Yeakel, Justices Jones and B. A. Smith
Affirmed
Filed: November 13, 1998
Do Not Publish
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.