Cody Edward Holder v. State
Cody Edward Holder v. State
Opinion
Holder contends this Court does not have jurisdiction of the appeal because no judgment of conviction appears in the record. The judgment was forwarded and filed in a supplemental clerk's record. The challenge to our jurisdiction is overruled.
Holder's brief states that aside from the jurisdictional issue disposed of above, the record does not reflect error because there is no reporter's record. Holder is represented by retained counsel, as he was at trial. There was no timely request for a free record. See Tex. R. App. P. 20.2. This Court previously determined that the absence of a reporter's record is due to Holder's fault. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(c).
We have reviewed the record before us and find no fundamental error or other matter that should be considered in the interest of justice. The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Mack Kidd, Justice
Before Justices Powers, Kidd and B. A. Smith
Affirmed
Filed: July 2, 1998
Do Not Publish
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.