Opinion by: Karen Angelini, Justice

Sitting: Tom Rickhoff, Justice

Sarah B. Duncan, Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Delivered and Filed: November 4, 1998

AFFIRMED

Michael Ray Grizzle's court-appointed appellate attorneys filed a brief in which they raise one arguable point of error, but nonetheless conclude that this appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978). Counsel states that appellant was provided with a copy of the brief and informed of his right to review the record and file his own brief. See Bruns v. State, 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1996, no pet.).

We have reviewed the record along with counsel's brief, and we agree that the appeal is without merit. The judgment of the trial court is, therefore, affirmed, and counsel's motion to withdraw is granted. See Nichols v. State, 954 S.W.2d 83, 86 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1997, no pet.).

KAREN ANGELINI

JUSTICE

DO NOT PUBLISH