Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 1998

Dale Alan Curtis v. Eddie Boggs

Dale Alan Curtis v. Eddie Boggs
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided May 20, 1998

Dale Alan Curtis v. Eddie Boggs

Opinion

DWOP-No Brief






IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS


No. 10-98-064-CV


     DALE ALAN CURTIS,

                                                                                              Appellant

     v.


     EDDIE BOGGS, ET AL.,

                                                                                              Appellees


From the 249th District Court

Johnson County, Texas

Trial Court # 249-219-97

                                                                                                                


MEMORANDUM OPINION

                                                                                                                


      Appellant Dale Alan Curtis filed suit against the former Sheriff of Johnson County and others. Curtis appeals from the court's dismissal of his in forma pauperis petition. Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 13.001 (Vernon Supp. 1998). Curtis timely filed a notice of appeal on February 20, 1998, and the transcript was filed in this court on March 11. Although his brief was due on April 10, he did not file it until April 25. Tex. R. App. P. 9.2(b), 38.6(a). Appellate Rule 38.8(a)(1) provides that if an appellant fails to timely file his brief, the Court may:

dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, unless the appellant reasonably explains the failure and the appellee is not significantly injured by the appellant’s failure to timely file a brief.

Id. 38.8(a)(1).

      The Appellees have filed motions requesting that we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution and that we strike Curtis’ brief for failure to comply with the applicable appellate rules. More than ten days have passed, and Curtis has not responded to the Appellees’ motions. See id. 10.3(a). Therefore, we grant the Appellees’ motion to dismiss and dismiss this cause for want of prosecution. Id. 38.8(a)(1). We dismiss the motion to strike as moot.

                                                                               PER CURIAM


Before Chief Justice Davis,

      Justice Vance, and

      Chief Justice McDonald (retired)

Dismissed for want of prosecution

Opinion delivered and filed May 20, 1998

Do not publish

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.