Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 1999

Neely v. Paredes

Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided July 15, 1999 · Hedges, Andell, Duggan

252 S.W.3d 419; 1999 Tex. App. LEXIS 5246; 1999 WL 497396 (South Western Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

After examining the record, this Court did not find a final, appealable judgment disposing of all the parties and claims in the trial court cause no. 97-51928. 1 On *420 June 24, 1999, we ordered that the appeal would be dismissed for want of jurisdiction, unless within 15 days of the order, appellant paid for and the district clerk filed a supplemental clerk’s record demonstrating that there is a final judgment, or appellant filed a brief demonstrating that there is a final judgment. See Tex. R.App.P. 42.3(a). Appellant has not done so. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

It is so ORDERED.

. Generally, Texas appellate courts have jurisdiction only over final judgments. North E. Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Aldridge, 400 S.W.2d 893, 895 (Tex. 1966). A judgment is final and ap-pealable if it disposes of all issues and parties. Id. The exceptions to this rule are not relevant in this case. See generally Tex.Civ.Prac. & Rem.Code Ann. § 51.014 (Vernon Supp. 1999).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.