Willie Wilritch v. State
Willie Wilritch v. State
Opinion
Appellant contends the court erred by ordering that he serve the three sentences consecutively because the causes arose out of the same criminal transaction and were consolidated for trial. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 3.03(a) (West Supp. 1999). Appellant also contends the court erred by cumulating these sentences with the sentence imposed in a felony case because the State failed to prove his identity as the person convicted in the felony. The State confesses error with respect to both contentions.
The points of error are sustained. The county court at law's judgments are modified to delete the cumulation orders. As modified, the judgments of conviction are affirmed.
Marilyn Aboussie, Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices B. A. Smith and Yeakel
Modified and, as Modified, Affirmed in Each Cause
Filed: November 30, 1999
Do Not Publish
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.