Clayton Emilienburg v. State
Clayton Emilienburg v. State
Opinion
Clayton Emilienburg perfected an appeal from his conviction for assault. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(c). He represents himself on appeal. The clerk's fee has not been paid and the clerk's record has not been filed. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.3(a). The Court notified appellant that the appeal would be dismissed if the clerk's record was not paid for by September 7, 1999. The Court received no response to this notice and payment has not been made. The appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(b).
Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices B. A. Smith and Yeakel
Dismissed for Want of Prosecution
Filed: October 7, 1999
Do Not Publish
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.