Timothy Lamon Proctor v. State
Timothy Lamon Proctor v. State
Opinion
Appellant did not pay for the reporter's record and none was filed. Appellant's retained attorney did not respond to this Court's notices. A hearing in the district court was ordered to determine whether appellant wished to pursue the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(a)(2). In response to this Court's order, counsel wrote a letter to the district court stating, "My client . . . Timothy Lamon Proctor, does not wish to continue his appeal." A copy of counsel's letter was forwarded to the Clerk by the coordinator for the 20th District Court. In her cover letter, the coordinator states that appellant's father contacted her and confirmed that appellant does not wish to pursue this appeal.
We will not dismiss an appeal in the absence of a proper motion. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.2. We conclude that the absence of a reporter's record is appellant's fault and that it is appropriate to decide the appeal without briefs. See Tex. R. App. P. 37.3(c), 38.8(b)(4). We have examined the clerk's record and find no fundamental error or other matter that should be considered in the interest of justice.
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
Lee Yeakel, Justice
Before Justices Jones, B. A. Smith and Yeakel
Affirmed
Filed: August 12, 1999
Do Not Publish
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.