These are appeals from judgments of conviction, on pleas of guilty, for aggravated assault and possession of cocaine with intent to deliver (two cases). The district court assessed punishment at imprisonment for ten years in the aggravated assault cause, and at imprisonment for twenty-five years in the possession causes.

In each cause, appellant's court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. Each brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), by advancing a contention which counsel says might arguably support the appeal. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Copies of counsel's briefs were delivered to appellant, and appellant was advised of his right to examine the appellate records and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.

We have reviewed the records and counsel's briefs and agree that the appeals are frivolous and without merit. In particular, we agree with counsel's determination that any errors or omissions in the admonishments given at the time appellant pleaded guilty cannot, on the records before us, be deemed harmful.

The judgments of conviction are affirmed.

Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices Kidd and Patterson

Affirmed

Filed: March 11, 1999

Do Not Publish