Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 1999

Frisco Development Corporation, Mini-Master Communities, Inc. and Kenneth M. Good v. Hope Enterprises, Ltd., HIP, L.L.C., and Grover H. Hope

Frisco Development Corporation, Mini-Master Communities, Inc. and Kenneth M. Good v. Hope Enterprises, Ltd., HIP, L.L.C., and Grover H. Hope
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided December 22, 1999

Frisco Development Corporation, Mini-Master Communities, Inc. and Kenneth M. Good v. Hope Enterprises, Ltd., HIP, L.L.C., and Grover H. Hope

Opinion







IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS


No. 10-99-169-CV

 

     FRISCO DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,

     MINI-MASTER COMMUNITIES, INC., AND

     KENNETH M. GOOD,

                                                                              Appellants

     v.


     HOPE ENTERPRISES, LTD., HIP, L.L.C.,

     GROVER H. HOPE,

                                                                              Appellees


From the Probate Court

Denton County, Texas

Trial Court #GC-96-00517-C

                                                                                                                

O P I N I O N

                                                                                                                


      Frisco Development Corporation, Mini-Master Communities, Incorporated, and Kenneth Good appealed from a take-nothing judgment rendered in favor of Hope Enterprises. However, the parties have filed an “Agreed Joint Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Appeal With Prejudice.” They state that a settlement agreement has been reached and ask that we dismiss this appeal with costs assessed against the party incurring them.

      In relevant portion, Rule 42.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides:

(a) The appellate court may dispose of an appeal as follows:

(1) in accordance with an agreement signed by all parties or their attorneys and filed with the clerk; or

(2) in accordance with a motion of appellant to dismiss the appeal or affirm the appealed judgment or order; but no party may be prevented from seeking any relief to which it would otherwise be entitled.

Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a).

      The motion is signed by attorneys for both parties. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. Id. 43.2(f). Costs are taxed against the party incurring same.

 

                                                                               PER CURIAM


Before Chief Justice Davis,

      Justice Vance, and

      Justice Gray

Dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed December 22, 1999

Do not publish

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.