Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 1999

Redcom Laboratories, Inc. v. Fiber Wave Telecom, Inc.

Redcom Laboratories, Inc. v. Fiber Wave Telecom, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided March 4, 1999

Redcom Laboratories, Inc. v. Fiber Wave Telecom, Inc.

Opinion

98211CV.White,Herman.fgm.ab.dism






IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS


No. 10-99-049-CV


     REDCOM LABORATORIES, INC.,

                                                                                   Appellant

     v.


     FIBER WAVE TELECOM, INC.

     AND BRAZOS BANK,

                                                                                   Appellees


From the 249th District Court

Johnson County, Texas

Trial Court # 249-95-98

                                                                                                                

MEMORANDUM OPINION

                                                                                                               


      Appellant Redcom Laboratories, Inc. has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. In relevant portion, Rule 42.1(a) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides:

(a) The appellate court may dispose of an appeal as follows:

(2) in accordance with a motion of appellant to dismiss the appeal or affirm the appealed judgment or order; but no other party may be prevented from seeking any relief to which it would otherwise be entitled.

Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(2).

      Redcom’s motion to dismiss contains a certificate of conference which states that Appellees do not oppose the motion. See id. 10.3(a)(2). Accordingly, this cause is dismissed with costs to be taxed against Appellant.

                                                                               PER CURIAM


Before Chief Justice Davis,

      Justice Vance, and

      Justice Gray

Dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed March 4, 1999

Do not publish

See

Tex. Dep't Corrections, Inmate Grievances (Inst. Div. January 1988). One of the remedies is "correction of records." Id. Because Ellis failed to exhaust his administrative remedies, the court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing his suit. Pedraza v. Tibbs, 826 S.W.2d 695, 699 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1992, writ dism'd w.o.j.).

      We affirm the judgment.

 

                                                                                 BILL VANCE

                                                                                 Justice


Before Chief Justice Thomas,

          Justice Cummings, and

          Justice Vance

Affirmed

Opinion delivered and filed September 13, 1995

Do not publish

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.