Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2000

Gerald Hawkins v. Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services

Gerald Hawkins v. Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided September 21, 2000

Gerald Hawkins v. Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN





NO. 03-00-00323-CV

NO. 03-00-00414-CV


Gerald Hawkins, Appellant


v.


Texas Department of Protective and Regulatory Services, Appellee





FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LLANO COUNTY, 33RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 10931, HONORABLE DONALD V. HAMMOND, JUDGE PRESIDING


PER CURIAM

Because appellant has failed to file a brief in either cause, we will dismiss the appeals for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b).

Hawkins filed a notice of appeal in trial court cause number 10931. This Court received a copy of this notice on May 8, 2000 and created appellate cause number 03-00-00323-CV. On that same date, Hawkins's attorney filed a motion to withdraw as attorney. On June 27, 2000, this Court received the clerk's record from trial court cause number 10931; instead of filing it in 03-00-00323-CV, however, this Court created appellate cause number 03-00-00414-CV. The key difference in this Court's treatment of these causes of action is that Hawkins was considered to be proceeding without an attorney in 03-00-00414-CV; this Court sent notices to both Hawkins and his attorney in 03-00-00323-CV, but sent notices only to Hawkins in 03-00-00414-CV.

Because the clerk's record was filed on June 27, 2000, appellant's brief was due on July 27, 2000. By letter dated August 9, 2000, the Clerk of this Court notified Hawkins that his appeal was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution unless appellant filed a brief by August 21, 2000, or tendered a motion for extension of time reasonably explaining the failure to do so. Thus far, appellant has submitted neither a brief nor a motion for extension of time to file a brief.

Because the two appeals are prompted by the same notice of appeal from the same party, we consolidate the two appeals into the appellate cause number containing the clerk's record, appellate cause number 03-00-00414-CV. Because Hawkins failed to file a brief or a motion for extension of time, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution on our own motion. See id. 42.3(b). Because Hawkins's failure to prosecute 03-00-00414-CV and the resultant dismissal of his appeal moots his attorney's motion to withdraw from the subsumed appellate cause, 03-00-00323-CV, we dismiss the motion to withdraw.

Before Justices Jones, Kidd and Yeakel

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: September 21, 2000

Do Not Publish

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.