Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2000

Danny Bell v. Unistar Leasing, Division of United Computer Capital Corp.

Danny Bell v. Unistar Leasing, Division of United Computer Capital Corp.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided February 16, 2000

Danny Bell v. Unistar Leasing, Division of United Computer Capital Corp.

Opinion

99-00682 Bell v Unistar Leasing.wpd

No. 04-99-00682-CV

Danny BELL,

Appellant

v.

UNISTAR LEASING, Division of United Computer Capital Corporation,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law, No. 5, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 253825

Honorable Karen Crouch, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Justice

Paul W. Green, Justice

Sarah B. Duncan, Justice

Delivered and Filed: February 16, 2000

DISMISSED

The parties have filed a joint motion to dismiss this appeal, stating that they have fully compromised and settled all issues in dispute. The motion is granted. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1). Because the cause is moot, all previous orders and judgments, both trial and appellate, are set aside and the cause is dismissed. See Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Hughes, 827 S.W.2d 859, 859 (Tex. 1992); Exxon Corp. v. Butler, 619 S.W.2d 399, 399 (Tex. 1981); Freeman v. Burrows, 141 Tex. 318, 171 S.W.2d 863, 863-64 (1943); Panterra v. American Dairy Queen, 908 S.W.2d 300, 301 (Tex. App.--San Antonio 1995, no writ). Costs of appeal are taxed against the parties who incurred them.

PER CURIAM

DO NOT PUBLISH

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.