in Re Lee Roger Simpson, Jr.
in Re Lee Roger Simpson, Jr.
Opinion
IN THE
TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-00-098-CV
IN RE LEE ROGER SIMPSON, JR.
Original Proceeding
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Respondent, the Honorable Alan Mayfield, Judge of the 74th District Court of McLennan County, dismissed Lee Roger Simpson, Jr.’s lawsuit because Simpson failed to comply with section 14.004 of the Civil Practice and Remedies Code. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 14.004 (Vernon Supp. 2000); Hickson v. Moya, 926 S.W.2d 397, 399 (Tex. App.—Waco 1996, no writ). Simpson seeks a writ of mandamus from this Court directing Respondent to permit him to amend his pleadings to include the affidavit required by Section 14.004.
“Mandamus issues only to correct a clear abuse of discretion or the violation of a duty imposed by law when there is no other adequate remedy by law.” Walker v. Packer, 827 S.W.2d 833, 839 (Tex. 1992) (orig. proceeding) (quoting Johnson v. Fourth Court of Appeals, 700 S.W.2d 916, 917 (Tex. 1985) (orig. proceeding)). Simpson has an adequate remedy by appeal. See, e.g., Hickson, 926 S.W.2d at 398-99. Accordingly, we deny his petition.
PER CURIAM
Before Chief Justice Davis,
Justice Gray, and
Chief Justice McDonald (retired)
Writ denied
Opinion delivered and filed March 29, 2000
Do not publish
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.