Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2000

Pedraza, L. Lee v. Crossroads Security Agency, Betty Marrufo and Fidel Puentes

Pedraza, L. Lee v. Crossroads Security Agency, Betty Marrufo and Fidel Puentes
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided December 21, 2000

Pedraza, L. Lee v. Crossroads Security Agency, Betty Marrufo and Fidel Puentes

Opinion



NUMBER 13-99-622-CV


COURT OF APPEALS


THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS


CORPUS CHRISTI

____________________________________________________________________

L. LEE PEDRAZA

, Appellant,

v.


CROSSROADS SECURITY AGENCY, ET AL.

, Appellees.

____________________________________________________________________

On appeal from the 377th District Court

of Victoria County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________________

O P I N I O N


Before Chief Justice Seerden and Justices Dorsey and Rodriguez

Opinion



Appellant, L. LEE PEDRAZA, perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by the 377th District Court of Victoria County, Texas, in cause number 95-1-47,510-D. The clerk's record was filed on January 3, 2000. The reporter's record was filed on January 11, 2000. Appellant's brief was due on September 12, 2000. To date, no appellate brief has been received.

When the appellant has failed to file a brief in the time prescribed, the Court may dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution, unless the appellant reasonably explains the failure and the appellee is not significantly injured by the appellant's failure to timely file a brief. Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1).

On November 13, 2000, notice was given to all parties that this appeal was subject to dismissal pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a)(1). Appellant was given ten days to explain why the cause should not be dismissed for failure to file a brief. To date, no response has been received.

The Court, having examined and fully considered the documents on file, appellant's failure to file a proper appellate brief, this Court's notice, and appellant's failure to respond, is of the opinion that the appeal should be dismissed for want of prosecution. The appeal is hereby DISMISSED FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.

Opinion delivered and filed

this the 21st day of December, 2000

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.