Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2001

Catarino Valdez, Jr. v. State

Catarino Valdez, Jr. v. State
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided November 15, 2001

Catarino Valdez, Jr. v. State

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-01-00594-CR

Catarino Valdez, Jr., Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 403RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 002352, HONORABLE FRANK W. BRYAN, JR., JUDGE PRESIDING

Appellant pleaded guilty to aggravated sexual assault of a child. See Tex. Pen. Code Ann. § 22.021 (West Supp. 2001). The district court adjudged him guilty and assessed punishment at imprisonment for twenty years, as called for in a plea bargain agreement. Appellant filed a general notice of appeal.

When a defendant pleads guilty to a felony and the punishment assessed does not exceed that recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant, the notice of appeal must state that the appeal is for a jurisdictional defect, or that the substance of the appeal was raised by written motion and ruled on before trial, or that the trial court granted permission to appeal. Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(b)(3); see also Cooper v. State, 45 S.W.3d 77, 79 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001) (rule 25.2(b) limits every appeal in plea bargain, felony case). Appellant’s notice of appeal does not comply with this rule and fails to confer jurisdiction on this Court. Whitt v. State, 45 S.W.3d 274, 275 (Tex. App.—Austin 2001, no pet.).

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction.

Bea Ann Smith, Justice Before Chief Justice Aboussie, Justices B. A. Smith and Puryear Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction Filed: November 15, 2001 Do Not Publish

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.