in the Matter of J. A. F.
in the Matter of J. A. F.
Opinion
J. A. F.'s appointed counsel on appeal filed a brief asserting that the appeal is frivolous. The brief complies with the requirements for such briefs discussed in In Re D.A.S., 973 S.W.2d 296 (Tex. 1998), and, more generally, in Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel states that she has diligently examined the record and researched the law applicable to the facts and issues in the case. Counsel's brief contains a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no meritorious errors to be advanced. A copy of counsel's brief was delivered to J. A. F. and to his parent, and they were advised of their right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. A pro se brief was not filed.
We have independently reviewed the record and agree with counsel that the appeal is frivolous. The order is affirmed.
__________________________________________
Mack Kidd, Justice
Before Justices Kidd, B. A. Smith and Puryear
Affirmed
Filed: March 29, 2001
Do Not Publish
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.