TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-00-00401-CR

Carl Wayne Truan, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BURNET COUNTY, 33RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 7987, HONORABLE GUILFORD L. JONES III, JUDGE PRESIDING

Appellant Carl Wayne Truan was placed on deferred adjudication community supervision after he pleaded guilty to the unauthorized use of a vehicle. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 31.07 (West 1994). The court later revoked supervision, adjudicated appellant guilty, and assessed punishment at imprisonment for two years and a $5000 fine.

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U. S. 738 (1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974); Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). A copy of counsel’s brief was delivered to appellant, and appellant was advised of his right to examine the appellate record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed.

We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief and agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

____________________________________ David Puryear, Justice Before Justices Kidd, B. A. Smith and Puryear Affirmed Filed: March 8, 2001 Do Not Publish