Opinion

Paul Allen Schumacher appeals from his conviction on his guilty plea for the offense of burglary of a habitation. No plea agreement was in place. In the same proceeding, he also pled guilty to three other charges of burglary of a habitation and to one charge of escape. The jury assessed punishment at fifty years' imprisonment.

Michael Skotnik was appointed as counsel on appeal and filed a brief on April 5, 2001, under the mandates of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and Ex parte Senna, 606 S.W.2d 329, 330 (Tex. Crim. App. 1980), and has accordingly also filed a motion to withdraw. Counsel sent Schumacher a copy of the brief and advised Schumacher by letter he believes there are no arguable contentions of error. He also informed Schumacher of his right to review the record and to file a brief pro se.

Schumacher filed a brief pro se on July 16, 2001, and then filed a supplement to that brief on August 15, 2001. His briefs raise the same issues in each appeal.

We have reviewed both briefs and all the arguments raised therein in our opinion issued this date in Paul Allen Schumacher v. State, cause number 06-00-00192-CR.

For the reasons stated in that opinion, we affirm the judgment.

Donald R. Ross

Justice

Date Submitted: December 7, 2001

Date Decided: December 10, 2001

Do Not Publish

t: small-caps">MEMORANDUM OPINION

            Alvin Dewayne Strong appeals from his conviction for theft of two grinders and a generator owned by Chad Bewley. Five indictments were tried together. Strong pled guilty to the charges pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement and was placed on five years' community supervision. The trial court revoked Strong's community supervision and sentenced Strong to two years' imprisonment. The cases have been appealed separately.

            Because the briefs and arguments raised therein are identical in all five appeals, for the reasons stated in Alvin Dewayne Strong v. The State of Texas, cause number 06-05-00261-CR, we likewise resolve the issues in this appeal in favor of the State.

            We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

                                                                        Jack Carter

                                                                        Justice

Date Submitted:          April 10, 2006

Date Decided:             June 6, 2006

Do Not Publish