Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, 2001

Jesus Sandoval v. T.D.C.J. - I.D.

Jesus Sandoval v. T.D.C.J. - I.D.
Court of Civil Appeals of Texas · Decided September 5, 2001

Jesus Sandoval v. T.D.C.J. - I.D.

Opinion

MARY'S OPINION HEADING

NO. 12-01-00205-CV



IN THE COURT OF APPEALS



TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS DISTRICT



TYLER, TEXAS



JESUS M. SANDOVAL,

§
APPEAL FROM THE 87TH

APPELLANT



V.

§
JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF



T.D.C.J.-I.D., ET AL.,

APPELLEES

§
ANDERSON COUNTY, TEXAS





PER CURIAM

This pro se informa pauperis appeal is being dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c). The judgment in the instant case was signed on July 3, 2001. Thereafter, on July 17, 2001, Appellant filed a notice of appeal which failed to contain the information required by Rule 25.1(e), i.e., a certificate of service showing service on all parties to the trial court's judgment.

Thus, on July 19, 2001, Appellant was notified pursuant to Tex. R. App. P. 37.1 that the notice of appeal was defective for failure to comply with Rule 25.1(e). He was further notified that unless he filed a corrected notice of appeal on or before August 20, 2001, the appeal would be referred to the court for dismissal. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3.

In accordance with this Court's notice, Appellant filed an amended notice of appeal on July 30, 2001. That notice, however, was also defective in that it still failed to comply with Rule 25.1(e). Since Appellant has persisted in failing to correct his defective notice of appeal after notice, the appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(c).

Opinion delivered September 5, 2001.

Panel consisted of Davis, C.J., Worthen, J., and Griffith, J.



DO NOT PUBLISH

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.