Sanchez, Hipolito Ramos, and Alma Laura Galvan De Ramos, Both Individually and...
Sanchez, Hipolito Ramos, and Alma Laura Galvan De Ramos, Both Individually and...
Opinion
NUMBER 13-97-436-CV
COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI
____________________________________________________________________
HIPOLITO RAMOS SANCHEZ AND ALMA LAURA GALVAN DE RAMOS, BOTH
INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF HERMES HIPOLITO RAMOS
GALVAN, DECEASED, Appellants,
v.
BROWNSVILLE SPORTS CENTER, INC., LEON JAMES, HONDA MOTOR CO., LTD.,
HONDA R&D CO., LTD., HONDA R&D NORTH AMERICA, INC., HONDA NORTH AMERICA, INC.,
AND AMERICAN HONDA MOTOR CO., INC., Appellees.
____________________________________________________________________
On appeal from the 197th District Court of Cameron County, Texas.
____________________________________________________________________
OPINION ON MOTIONS FOR REHEARING
Before Justices Hinojosa, Yañez, and Rodriguez
Opinion by Justice Hinojosa
Appellees, Honda Motor Co., Ltd., Honda R&D Co., Ltd., Honda R&D North America, Inc., Honda North America, Inc., and American Honda Motor Co., Inc., have filed a motion for rehearing. We overrule appellees' motion for rehearing.
Appellants, Hipolito Ramos Sanchez and Alma Laura Galvan de Ramos, both individually and on behalf of the Estate of Hermes Hipolito Ramos Galvan, Deceased, have also filed a motion for rehearing, in which they raise twelve points of error. Appellees have filed a response to appellants' motion for rehearing.
In their first point of error, appellants contend this Court erred in failing to include prejudgment interest in the judgments we rendered in our original opinion.
The record reflects that appellants requested prejudgment interest in their trial pleadings and in the brief they filed with this Court. Under the finance code in effect at the time of these judgments and its predecessor statute, prejudgment interest begins to accrue on the earlier of (1) 180 days after the date a defendant receives a written notice of a claim or (2) the date suit is filed. Tex. Fin. Code Ann. § 304.104 (Vernon Supp. 2001) (prior version, Act of June 3, 1987, 70th Leg., 1st C.S., ch. 3, § 1, 1987 Tex. Gen. Laws 51); Johnson & Higgins of Tex., Inc. v. Kenneco Energy, Inc., 962 S.W.2d 507, 531 (Tex. 1998). Prejudgment interest accrues as simple interest at the rate of ten percent per annum. Tex. Fin. Code Ann. §§ 304.103, 304.104 (Vernon Supp. 2001) (prior version, Act of June 3, 1987, 70th Leg., 1st C.S., ch. 3, § 1, 1987 Tex. Gen. Laws 51); Johnson & Higgins, 962 S.W.2d at 531. Prejudgment interest accrues until the day preceding the date judgment is rendered. Tex. Fin. Code Ann. § 304.104 (Vernon Supp. 2001) (prior version, Act of June 3, 1987, 70th Leg., 1st C.S., ch. 3, § 1, 1987 Tex. Gen. Laws 51).
The record establishes that Hermes Hipolito Ramos Galvan was fatally injured on February 19, 1995, when he lost control of a Honda three-wheel all-terrain vehicle, and that appellants filed suit against appellees on May 30, 1995. We conclude that prejudgment interest in this case runs from May 30, 1995 until February 7, 2001, the day preceding the date of judgment, at the rate of ten percent per annum. We find no evidence in the record that prejudgment interest was tolled during this time period. We sustain the first point of error of appellants' motion for rehearing.
We grant appellants' motion for rehearing as to point of error number one. The remaining points of error of appellants'
motion for rehearing are overruled. We modify the judgments we rendered in our original opinion to include prejudgment
interest at the rate of ten percent per annum from May 30, 1995 until February 7, 2001.
FEDERICO G. HINOJOSA
Justice
Publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.3.
Opinion delivered and filed this the
2nd day of August, 2001.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.